Blog

Jaime Miracle testifies before the Ohio House Education Committee on November 13, 2025.

---

Jaime Miracle, Deputy Director 
House Education Committee 
Testimony in Opposition to HB 485 
November 13, 2025 

Chair Fowler Arthur, Vice Chair Odioso, Ranking Member Brennan, and members of the House Education Committee, I am here this morning to present opponent testimony on House Bill 485.  As I begin, I would like to thank my Policy Fellow Milena Wood for her assistance with this testimony. On behalf of Abortion Forward and our thousands of members and supporters across the state, we stand in firm opposition to this bill. Ohio students deserve better. 

Our schools should exist to provide students with an education that gives them the tools to be robust, critical thinkers. We often hear from members about how it is not the job of our public schools to instill political beliefs in children; that it is the job of parents to guide their children on the path they deem most fit. It is interesting that this principle no longer applies when certain groups with perspectives that match the perspectives of the majority party want to capitalize on an opportunity to push their own agenda. 

Sponsors and proponents of HB 485 claim that the bill is about “instruction in human growth and development.” In fact, it mandates the insertion of a single political agenda and worldview into our public-school curriculum, a worldview many Americans do not subscribe to.  

The video recommended by the Baby Olivia Act is also full of medical inaccuracies and misleading talking points.¹ This use of inaccurate and misleading content is part of a greater trend—and arguably the organizational mission—of Live Action, creator of the Baby Olivia video. Live Action has been reviewed and confirmed by third parties to promote pseudoscience and whose “sole mission is to discredit Planned Parenthood and to advocate for Pro-Life policies.”² While we do not oppose their right to express their viewpoint in the public arena, pseudoscience and misinformation do not have a place in education—least of all in mandated curriculum for elementary-aged students. 

I remind the committee that Ohio is the only state without health education standards, and this bill does not remedy that failure. The bill does not require any actual, age-appropriate human growth and development curriculum that would give students the context for concepts related to pregnancy and fetal development. It is most certainly not a substitute for comprehensive, age-appropriate health education that equips students with the information they need to make healthy decisions across their life span.  

When we say “age-appropriate curriculum,” that means the content of the curriculum changes by grade to be appropriate for students of that age. An elementary aged student has a much different understanding of complex concepts like pregnancy, conception, and childbirth than an 18-year-old in 12th grade. As much as the bill’s sponsors would like to claim, it is impossible for one video to be age-appropriate for that entire timespan. 

Given its medical inaccuracies, the Baby Olivia video is inappropriate for any age group. It is especially inappropriate for elementary students that lack an understanding of the concepts the video purports to show and the critical thinking skills to assess the accuracy of those concepts.  

Any curriculum standard to be enforced in Ohio schools should also contain a requirement that the information provided be factually accurate. HB 485 has no such requirement. A teacher or a school could literally make anything up they wanted to and it would be presented as fact to students with no context for them to discern if the information being presented as fact is actual fact. We would never accept a math teacher teaching our children that 2+2=6, we cannot allow factually inaccurate information in any of our school curriculum requirements. 

Ohio law contains explicit allowances for parents who want to opt their children out of sex education, child abuse education, and several other subjects. We have heard over and over again from members of this body that parents must be in control of their child’s education. Why does this provision—the requirement to show a political propaganda video with demonstrated medical inaccuracies—not contain a similar opportunity for parental opt-out?  If this committee truly believes that parents should be in control of their child’s education, that principle should be applied consistently and not change based on the worldview of the video creator and the majority party.  

Additionally, the bill as written is confusing at best, impossible at worst, for school districts to implement. The way the bill is written it sounds like teachers should be able to show one video and meet the requirement, but that is not possible with the current language. If schools are to create a whole new video to show to students, this bill should certainly come with funding for districts to ensure the curriculum can meet these standards and also provide students with age-appropriate and scientifically accurate information. 

Given how impossible this bill will be to comply with, the consequences of how this bill will be enforced are especially concerning. The bill gives the Attorney General the power to enforce the law and allows the AG to bring a lawsuit against any “person or entity” that violates the curriculum requirements. This means that any district or individual teacher that fails to show the “Meet Baby Olivia” video could risk being sued by the AG for both damages and injunctive relief to force their compliance. The bill also requires that the Department of Education conduct an annual audit of districts to confirm compliance with the Baby Olivia and ultrasound video requirements and publish their findings online. This bill will punish districts and schools for not complying with a non-compliable set of requirements with no clear way to accurately calculate “damages” as outlined in the bill.  

Bill sponsors and proponents claim that HB 485 has nothing to do with abortion, but if that is the case, why was every single proponent who testified either an anti-abortion group or a person or organization with close ties to an anti-abortion group? If this bill is really about human development organizations where are the unbiased experts in human development?  

Ohio already gives more than 20 million dollars in funding to anti-abortion, fake clinics. This bill is just another attempt to use state funds and resources to spread anti-abortion propaganda and misinformation. By mandating engagement with the Baby Olivia video, this committee would flood our schools with a level of misinformation that should not be tolerated at any level of education. We strongly oppose HB 485 and ask that you consider deeply the ramifications of allowing such rhetoric to be a normalized component of our children’s educations.  

Public schools are not a place to make religious assertions out to be fact, nor a battleground for the political ends the adults who are supposed to protect our children’s education decide to take up.  

Abortion Forward Deputy Director Jaime Miracle testifies before the Ohio House Medicaid Committee on November 4, 2025 against House Bill 410.

---

Jaime Miracle, Deputy Director 
House Medicaid Committee 
Testimony in Opposition to HB 410 
November 4, 2025 

Chair Gross, Vice Chair Barhorst, Ranking Member Baker, and members of the House Medicaid Committee, I come before you today in strong opposition House Bill 410, a bill which would block tens of thousands of Ohioans from accessing their preferred healthcare provider. My name is Jaime Miracle, and I am the deputy director for Abortion Forward, formerly Pro-Choice Ohio.  

As I stand before this committee at yet another hearing on yet another unconstitutional bill attacking abortion access and the medical professionals who provide abortion care. A hearing that was announced just 30 hours ago, giving people only six hours to re-arrange their lives, write testimony, and make travel plans to come before you to provide testimony and make their voices heard. Some of those people did all of that just to hear the next morning that even though they followed every rule their testimony would STILL not be accepted because the chair had decided to limit testimony to just five people today – a rule announced after the fact to silence their voices.  

Today is Election Day. By scheduling this committee at a time when many Ohioans are in their community voting or otherwise engaged in their local election, giving people such a short turnaround time to submit testimony and THEN calling them to tell them that an arbitrary rule created on a whim meant that their testimony would not be allowed to be heard, this committee is showing just how little it cares about democracy. May I remind you that you are sent here to represent the people, not rule us.  Ohioans deserve better. 

On another Election Day, this one in November 2023, voters overwhelmingly passed the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment to enshrine the right to abortion and other reproductive healthcare services into the Ohio Constitution. Just two years later it seems this body has forgotten what the voters passed. The Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 22 now reads, in part,  

Every individual has a right to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions, including but not limited to decisions on: contraception; fertility treatment; continuing one’s own pregnancy; miscarriage care; and abortion. The State shall not, directly or indirectly, burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against either: an individual’s voluntary exercise of this right or a person or entity that assists an individual exercising this right. 

HB 410 is limiting access to Medicaid reimbursements for “a person or entity that assists an individual” in obtaining constitutionally protected abortion services and therefore clearly unconstitutionally discriminates against these entities because they also provide abortion services. 

Ohio already bans Medicaid and other public funds from being used for abortion care except for three narrow exceptions for rape, incest, or risk to life of the pregnant person (ORC 9.04). This ban already blocks people on Medicaid from accessing the abortion care they need. Now, HB 410 proposes to expand that ban to all healthcare services if the provider of that healthcare also provides abortion care. This new expansion of Ohio’s Medicaid ban will leave tens of thousands of Ohioans without access to the preventive care and other services they and their families need to live healthy lives. 

We all hear every day about how Ohioans are being squeezed by the rising costs of housing, food, and the basic needs of their families. HB 410 will just add to the financial disaster being experienced by our friends and neighbors. It is wrong to force people to choose between continuing care with a trusted provider but having to pay out of pocket for that care, something they cannot afford, or switching away from their trusted provider so they can still use their Medicaid coverage.  

Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio operates eight health care centers in designated Primary Care Health Care Shortage areas. What does that mean? If HB 410 is enacted, their patients will have nowhere else to go. There are already not enough providers to serve people in these shortage areas, and now this committee is hearing a bill that will further limit access to health care providers. 

Ohio continues to be in a maternal and infant health care crisis. Our infant mortality rate is still higher than the national average, and Ohio rakes 43^rd in the country. Our maternal mortality rate is also higher than the national average, with Ohio raking 22^nd in the country. Our infant mortality rate for Black individuals is nearly two times the state rate, and 2.5 times higher than the rate for white Ohioans.¹  

Why is this committee trying to limit access to healthcare at a time where we should be looking everywhere for solutions to increase access to care? 

As I close today, I’d like to remind you of the oath you pledged as you took office earlier this year. “I do solemnly swear to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Ohio, and faithfully to discharge and perform all duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Ohio House of Representatives according to the best of my ability and understanding…”  

If this clearly unconstitutional bill and a hearing designed to silence the people’s voices at every turn is the best the people of Ohio can expect from their representatives, I urge you to do better, to try harder.  The people of Ohio deserve leaders who truly lead, not ones who placate their political base, silence the voices of their opponents, and ignore the constitution they swore to uphold.  

Our Communications Director Gabriel Mann testified against unfair, rigged congressional maps during this hearing of the Ohio Redistricting Commission on October 30, 2025.

---

10/31/25 Update: The Ohio Redistricting Commission voted to approve a map. Our statement is on our Press Release page.

---

Gabriel Mann, Communications Director
Ohio Redistricting Commission
October 30, 2025

Co-Chairs Antonio, Stewart, and members of the Redistricting Commission, thank you for accepting my testimony today. My name is Gabriel Mann, and I am the communications director for Abortion Forward, formerly Pro-Choice Ohio. I am here today urging you to pass a congressional district map that represents the people of Ohio, like the maps submitted by the Senate Democrats or the Ohio Citizens’ Redistricting Commission-drawn map that the Equal Districts coalition re-submitted.

I’d like to start by asking a simple question: What are we doing here? We are 24 hours away from the constitutionally mandated deadline and we still haven’t seen a map proposal. On top of that, it’s Trick or Treat night, which means that you’re holding an important public hearing that impacts families at the exact hour when many parents across Ohio are committed to spending this time with their children in a treasured tradition. Cutting families out of the legislative process as you sit here and consider maps that cut families out of our democracy is unacceptable.

Ohio families deserve and need representation in government, and this process has shown exactly how much legislators in Ohio want to rule us, not represent us. This is not the time for you to try to make up for the fact that you’ve been ignoring constitutionally required deadlines.

In 2023, we saw a clear example of why gerrymandered districts fail to represent the views of the voters that elected officials are supposed to be representing. Fifty-seven percent of the voters that cast ballots in November 2023 voted in favor of the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment, enshrining the right to abortion and other reproductive health care services in the Ohio Constitution. Why did the voters have to do that? Because for over a decade the gerrymandered Ohio Legislature had been going against their will enacting more than 30 bans and restrictions on abortion. Not only did voters have to go to the ballot, collecting hundreds of thousands of signatures, to get the measure qualified to appear on the ballot, but the same voters had to come out and vote in a special election just months before the November election to fight back a legislatively created constitutional amendment solely focused on making the November election impossible to win.

This gerrymandered Ohio Legislature has one goal: rigging the process in their favor because they cannot win based on the merits of their arguments. You know the policies you are passing do not represent the will of the people, you read the same polling I do.

In 2024, 5.8 million Ohioans came out to vote in the November general election. 55% of those voted for the Republican candidate for president. 44% percent of them voted for the Democrat. A representative map for Ohio should be one that comes close to those numbers, giving Ohioans from both parties the representation that matches the state composition. Our current congressional map gives Ohioans 10 Republican and 5 Democratic seats in congress, a 67% to 33% breakdown far from the representational number of 55% to 45%.

In the United States, we have a representative democracy. The people elect individuals to represent the needs of our communities in government. Unfortunately, states like Ohio have strayed from this foundational principle, creating district boundaries not based upon representation, but biased to a single party to win elections. The very foundation of our democracy is at risk when the people of our state no longer have true representation from their elected officials.

I am outraged that this hearing is the first and likely only opportunity for testimony before the second deadline in this redistricting process. I’m also highly appalled that the public has been completely cut out of this process. Back-room meetings outside the public view are not how to draw maps. Leadership means coming together and doing what is right for the people you serve.

President Trump has dictated to his supporters that they should do whatever they can to rig the election to favor Republicans in 2026 and beyond. States like Texas have followed that edict and once again taken away the voices of the people that leaders are supposed to represent. Ohio cannot and should not follow that trend and further rig our already gerrymandered congressional districts. This process should not be about which party wins or loses. It should be about ensuring that voters win; that the voices of the people are heard in our government, and Ohioans have elected officials that will actually represent the needs of their community.

The map submitted by the Democrats and the Ohio Citizens’ Redistricting Commission drawn map re-submitted by the Equal Districts coalition both meet both the spirit and the letter of the 2018 voter-approved constitutional reform. We encourage this committee and the legislature to adopt one of these maps for bipartisan passage before tomorrow’s deadline to give Ohioans what they deserve: a representative democracy where the voices and needs of their communities are heard.

Ohioans deserve true representation in our government. When we don’t get good maps, Ohioans lose, communities lose.

Molly Rampe Thomas is the president of the Abortion Forward board and the founder and CEO of JustChoice. She testified against House Bill 324 before the Ohio House Health Committee on October 8, 2025.

Molly Rampe Thomas, CEO and Founder of JustChoice
HB 324 Opponent Testimony

Chairperson Schmidt, Vice-Chair Deeter, and Ranking Member Dr. Somani, thank you for the
opportunity to speak today. My name is Molly Rampe Thomas, and I am a Founder and CEO
testifying on behalf of JustChoice.

Our core belief at JustChoice is Justice is Choice. This means the right of every person to make
their own healthcare decisions with dignity and without burden. I am here today in strong
opposition to House Bill 324 because I have seen firsthand the human cost of the barriers it
seeks to create. I am here for the single parent who cannot take another unpaid day off work,
the survivor of domestic violence for whom a mandatory clinic visit is a terrifying risk, the rural
Ohioan who must travel hundreds of miles and find childcare for a simple appointment.

I oppose H.B. 324 because it is built on a foundation that is not just weak, but deliberately
manufactured.

The report used to justify this bill is not science for many reasons:
● It is unverifiable because its authors refuse to reveal their data.
● It is deliberately misleading because it labels routine, non-urgent health visits as lifethreatening
emergencies.
● It’s policy prescriptions are ideologically driven, with no connection to its own analysis.

To shape legislation around a document of such poor credibility is to abandon evidence-based
governance. This decision ignores decades of rigorous, transparent medical research that
consistently affirms the safety of telehealth medicine.

At its heart, justice is choice and it is accountability. As you consider this decision, I sincerely
hope you will feel accountable to the people of Ohio—to their needs and their rights. I urge you
to reject this damaging bill and the flawed process that brought it forward.

Thank you for your time. I am happy to take any questions the committee may have.

Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance are currently accepting applications for their Boards of Directors!

We encourage you to apply if you’re passionate about protecting and advancing reproductive rights, increasing access to reproductive health care — especially abortion care — pursuing policy changes that support abortion access, and value reproductive justice and autonomy for communities across our state.

What do you need to know about joining the Abortion Forward or the Abortion Forward Alliance board?

Abortion Forward, a 501(c)(4) organization, and Abortion Forward Alliance, a 501(c)(3) organization, are grounded in the principles of reproductive justice. We are working to maintain and expand abortion access in Ohio. We are looking for board members who are interested in engaging in this strategic work and support this next phase of our work. If you’re interested and willing to roll up your sleeves and get to work, we need you!

The boards and their members have specific roles and associated responsibilities as the two organizations’ governing bodies. Learn more about this in the position description below.

We welcome applications from all who are interested in supporting Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance through board service. It is helpful for us to have board members with a variety of specific skills, expertise, and lived experience. If you have any expertise in these areas, please include this information in your application: HR, accounting, fundraising, PR and media, business and financial planning, organizing, advocacy, electoral politics (ideally in the reproductive health, rights, and justice sector but any and all social justice expertise is welcome). We are also committed to the inclusion of people who are deeply connected to the following communities: Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), LGBTQ+, people living with disabilities, people in rural communities, and those in Southwest Ohio and Southeast Ohio.

Ready to apply? Please fill out this application form and have two reference forms completed on your behalf. We are accepting rolling applications through October 31, 2025 with the goal of onboarding new Board members in January 2026 with the expectation of attending the March board meeting.

If you have any questions, please email board@abortionforward.org.

We hope that you’ll consider applying to join one of our boards and thank you for your continued support for Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance!

---

Abortion Forward/Abortion Forward Alliance
Board of Directors Position Description

Board members shall:
● Be committed to the missions of Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance.
Attend four 4-hour board meetings per year (2 virtual and 2 in person), monthly planning meetings (1 hour), and other committee meetings and training as necessary.
● Assist in developing policies and understand their responsibility to help carry out the agreed upon goals.
● Be accountable to and supportive of other board members enabling one another to fulfill board commitments.
● Be a spokesperson in the community for Abortion Forward and/or Abortion Forward Alliance as needed.
● Approve and monitor the annual budget and monthly financial reports and ensure adequate financial resources.
● Help with the fundraising efforts for Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance fundraising efforts. This can include donating or raising money, helping solicit other gifts or identifying potential donors, participating in fundraising events and volunteering time to the organization. Overall, we ask for our board to be a high priority in your charitable giving.
● Participate in and monitor strategic planning.
● Participate on at least one committee: Current committees include Governance, Board Development, Human Resources/Personnel, Finance, Fundraising/Development, and Political Action Committee.
● Promote diversity, equity and inclusion within the organization.
● Nominate/supply names of prospective new board members.
● Recruit new supporters and volunteers.
● Represent the organization with a values-aligned approach.
● Build supportive working relationships with staff.
● Participate in hiring and firing the Executive Director.
● Participate in supporting and evaluating the Executive Director.
● Ensure legal and ethical integrity.
● Adhere to the conflict of interest, confidentiality and other policies of the organization.

Board Expectations
Board Members can expect to spend approximately 3-5 hours per month on board work including active participation in meetings, calls, and committees. Additionally, board members are expected to communicate their ability to attend meetings, calls, and committees to the Board President.

Board terms are three years. Each Board Member is expected to serve a minimum of one full term.

As a governing board, the board of directors is not involved with the day-to-day operations of Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance. That work is overseen by the Executive Director and executed by staff. Board Members at Abortion Forward and Abortion Forward Alliance are expected to be responsive to and provide strategic guidance to the Executive Director, and assist with fundraising, raising visibility, and deepening community connections to the organization.

Accountability
Missing more than two quarterly board meetings, without communication to the Board President, annually for any reason may be grounds for dismissal from the board.

Board Officer Roles and Responsibilities
Each board has officers: a President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. Both the Secretary and Treasurer sit on both the c3 and c4 boards. Officer Terms are one year.

Board President
The President is responsible for calling for and presiding over board meetings, executive committee meetings, and overseeing the Board of Directors and board policies and actions. The President serves as the primary contact for any board issues that may arise and sets goals and objectives with the Board and ensures that they are met. Additionally, the President is the board’s official spokesperson and serves as an ex-officio member of any ad hoc board committees.

Vice President
The Vice President is responsible for assuming the President’s duties in their absence. Additionally, they are tasked with working with the Executive Director for all Board at-large and officer nominations and elections.

Treasurer
The Treasurer serves as the primary financial officer of the organization and, in collaboration with the Executive Director or another designated staff person, is responsible for reviewing monthly financial reports, providing timely financial reports to the Board of Directors, ensures the submission of tax and legal compliance reports to the appropriate government entities, and oversees the annual audit and budget processes.

Secretary
The Secretary is responsible for recording, maintaining, and disseminating the organization’s records, such as Board meeting minutes and other relevant organizational documents. Additionally, the secretary is responsible for conducting all votes taken (mail, email, verbal) during board business, and sharing this information with the Executive Director.